Souke Sports Men’s Cycling Underwear Shorts 4D Padded Bike Bicycle MTB

12 reviews for Souke Sports Men’s Cycling Underwear Shorts 4D Padded Bike Bicycle MTB

1. 

   Jersey Guy – 15 December 2024

   Excellent
   Overall a very comfy product. 6’2 235lbs. XXL size fits perfectly. Shorts do not move around like some others I have had. They are great under leggings for the cold.For me the pad is excellent..not too bulky and very comfy for my 20 mile rides. Worthwhile investment.

2. 

   C. McMillan – 15 December 2024

   Short stretchy and well padded
   I’m 5’9″ and about 210 lbs. 30″ inseam. The XL fit me well. Plenty of stretch to accommodate my out of shape dad bod.Padding is sufficient. I’d prefer less poof/volume and more density but that’s hard to find, especially in the unpronouncable brands.What I like is how short these are.. they come to mid-thigh in the XL. That’s hard to find.I tried Spooneed as well.. and while those were nice, the legs were too long… came all the way to my knee. If I could lose weight and wear a large, then they might work.The grip/elastic at the bottom of the leg is a little tight for my massive quads but not uncomfortable. They stay put.The fabric is very soft and thin with sort of a waffle weave to it. I wouldn’t feel super comfortable wearing these without an over-short if I were riding in a city and/or stopping to run errands.. but I’m old school and practice some modesty.Good shorts, good price. Not great like 10-20 year ago $80 shorts you’d get from Specialized, Pearl Iz.. but still very good for the money.

3. 

   EYROYS – 15 December 2024

   Real world motorcycle review
   Wow, who would of thought just a little extra cushion could make a diffence. We went on a long ride, about 300 miles, around Hot Springs Arkansas and the usual back soreness that I usually get after a couple miles never appeared. The next day was a shorter ride, and a little chillier, so had jeans on with my riding pants and I didn’t know how it would be, so I didn’t wear the shorts. Well, halfway through that ride, my back started up and I had to keep twisting and stretching to get through the ride, only about 120 miles. So yes, how and why these shorts work, they are definitely worth it. I’ll also add, I use an airhawk cusion as well.Update: I just rode about 350 miles today, with the shorts, and jeans, and my riding pants and again, there were no issues of tightness, or bunching up. And no back soreness either! I would definitely recommend these for any motorcycle rider, even if you already have a good seat or seat pad in use!

4. 

   Dean Martens – 15 December 2024

   Very Comfortable
   The extra padding works great for me. I had an old pair of padded shorts and I don’t get bum fatigue anymore. They look good too.

5. 

   Will Pearce – 15 December 2024

   More expensive than comparable products in my comparison review of low-cost cycling underwear shorts
   I’m a cyclist. Most frequently, I’m riding my road bike for exercise on either greenways or roads, in which case I’m wearing padded, suspender-style cycling shorts.On occasion, however, I’m riding my commuter bike while on a recreational ride with my wife. In these cases, I’ve got a pair of loose-fitting, unpadded touring bike shorts to wear. In the past, I’ve simply worn a pair of athletic undershorts under the touring bike shorts. Over time, I had decided that really needed the padding that I had with my regular cycling shorts, but didn’t want to wear my regular cycling shorts for recreational cycling instead of my touring shorts (as we sometimes combine a ride with a restaurant stop or social visit).Wearing regular cycling shorts underneath my touring shorts would be way too bulky and inconvenient, so my solution was to look for a pair of relatively-inexpensive padded cycling underwear shorts to combine with my touring bike shorts.Padded cycling underwear shorts have padding similar to, but less dense than, regular cycling shorts (so not quite as good, but good enough for a “comfort” saddle or a well-padded MTB saddle). They are made of lighter-weight, mesh fabric (similar to daily-wear stretch boxer briefs). That lighter fabric is a bit more revealing, so they really need to be worn underneath another pair of shorts, pants, or tights (which is what they’re made for, of course).Given that I would be using these only occasionally, I decided to limit the cost to $25 (at the time of my purchase on 5/25/22).Based on my experience with regular cycling shorts, I was specifically looking for Mens Cycling Underwear Shorts that had the following features: * Wide waistband (narrow waistbands tend to roll during a ride or lose their stretch sooner after repeated washing). * Ample padding (for use with a comfort or well-padded MTB saddle) with good coverage; a too-small pad is as bad as a too-thin pad. * Longer inseam (I’m 6’2″ with 34″ inseam legs and long thighs; shorter inseam stretch shorts ride up on my thighs, which is annoying during daily wear, let alone during a bike ride). * Leg bottom-seam gripper material (again, to lessen the chance of the legs riding up); this is usually some kind of stretchy silicone material. * A structural design with multiple panels (for an optimized fit for a seated position); good cycling shorts will have 8 or more panels, exclusive of the crotch pad panel; the reviewed products all have either 9 or 10 panels. Note: The lighter-weight stretch mesh fabric used in the reviewed products may make panel count a less-significant factor than with regular cycling shorts. * Flat seams at all panel joints (as opposed to a gathered seam, which bunches up, and can cause irritation during athletic activities).I’ll admit that this was a pretty demanding feature list for a target price of <$25; to my surprise,there were 5 candidate products that were worth ordering for comparison.Below are my evaluations of the fit and features of these cycling underwear shorts, with the names given as shown on the Amazon product pages (price in parentheses; all were solid black in size XL and fit my 39" waist comfortably; inseam lengths measured from the center of the crotch panel):* Przewalski Mens Cycling Underwear Shorts 4D Padded Bike Undershorts Bicycle MTB Liner Shorts with Silicone Leg Grippers ($14.99) - This product is my top choice, as it has all my desired features, and is the only product with a 9" inseam. It is made with a 90% polyester, 10% spandex mesh material (according to the Amazon product description; there was no material composition tag in the product, but it definitely felt like polyester microfiber). Additionally, the leg gripper is a solid silicone band, which is what I'm used to seeing in higher-quality cycling shorts. Finally, this product has 100% flat seams. One possible con: Because of the long inseam, the bottom of the leg falls just below the thickest part of my thighs, making the bottom edge feel slightly loose, but the quality of the gripper band gives me confidence that I won't have any issues with their riding up. If you have more-slender thighs, however, this may not be the product for you. Note that the product received didn't visually match the photos on the Amazon product page--the waistband has the brand name on it (versus solid black in the photos) and the seat pad design looks slightly different (more forward coverage than shown in the photos, which is actually good, though it does leave me wondering whether you're actually getting the padding densities that are shown in the pad "exploded view" image).* [THIS PRODUCT] Souke Sports Men's Cycling Underwear Shorts 4D Padded Bike Bicycle MTB Liner Shorts with Anti-Slip Leg Grips ($24.99) - The most expensive product in this comparison, it has a higher-density pad than my top choice (though the coverage isn't quite as good to the front of the pad). If you'll be riding on a road bike saddle (or a less-padded MTB saddle) instead of a comfort saddle, this product may be the ticket for a comfortable ride for you. It is made with a 90% polyester, 10% spandex mesh material, and has a 6.5" inseam. The gripper material is woven into a stretch bottom-seam panel (which should work OK, but not as well as the solid silicone band in my top choice). One significant con is that the inner leg seams are NOT flat seams, so be conscious of the possibility of inner-thigh chafing.* XGC Men's Cycling Underwear Shorts with High-Density High-Elasticity and Highly Breathable 4D Gel Padded ($19.99) - This product is almost identical to the Souke product, with different branding and a slightly-less-dense pad. It is made with a 95% polyester, 5% elastane mesh material, and has a 6.5" inseam. All other features and notes on the Souke product review also apply to this product (including the absence of inner-leg flat seams).* Nice Win Mens 4D Padded Bike Shorts Anti-slip Leg Cycling Underwear MTB Liner Wide WaistBand Biking Bicycle Motorcycle Underpants - This product has a lower-density pad than the previous three products in this review. While this may work OK with a comfort saddle, I don't think I'd recommend it for use with an MTB saddle (and certainly not with a road bike saddle). It is made with an 81% nylon, 19% spandex mesh material (not polyester, as stated in the Amazon product description), and has a 7" inseam. The gripper material is woven into a stretch bottom-seam panel (which should work OK, but not as well as the solid silicone band in my top choice). One significant con is that the inner leg seams are NOT flat seams, so be conscious of the possibility of inner-thigh chafing. Note: The nylon material in this product has a much more "slippery" feel to it than the polyester microfiber material in the other four reviewed products. This may lead to some "slippage" between these shorts and your outwear shorts/pants, which could result in some sliding around on the bike saddle. I didn't test this product on a ride, so I can't say for sure that this would be a problem, but be aware of the possibility.* Baleaf Men's Cycling Underwear Shorts 3D Padded Bike Bicycle Pants Quick-Dry Tights ($22.99; a 10% coupon was available) - This product has a lower-density pad than the first three products in this review (similar to the Nice Win product). While this may work OK with a comfort saddle, I don't think I'd recommend it for use with an MTB saddle (and certainly not with a road bike saddle). It is made with a 90% polyester, 10% spandex mesh material, and has a 5.5" inseam (a full inch shorter than any other reviewed product). Finally, this product DOES have 100% flat seams. There is one very significant con: To my surprise, there is NO gripper material at the bottom of the legs; combined with the shorter-than-average inseam, I would be concerned about the legs riding up while cycling.

6. 

   Joe – 15 December 2024

   Good
   They fit good and feel high quality. The padding is pretty crazy and gives you a bubble butt but you feel nothing but cushion when seated lol

7. 

   ndrwum – 15 December 2024

   good value
   The Souke Sports Cycling Underwear Shorts are excellent! The 4D padding is comfortable, and the anti-slip leg grips stay in place. Could use some more padding coverage as there are some places with padding.

8. 

   Jos̩ Miguel Baumgarten Р15 December 2024

   Excelente articulo, fiel a la descripción, 100% recomendado !!!

9. 

   Synonymous – 15 December 2024

   These are well made and fit just a tad small. I ordered the large and am a 36″ waist at the moment. They’re supposed to be tight fitting, though. The leg bands are generous and comfortable. The padding is thick so if you’re used to Castelli singlets be aware that these are well padded. Waist band is also comfortable. Such a good deal considering the aforementioned brand is in the mid $200 range for the budget model. Highly recommended.

10. 

    Jcmica – 15 December 2024

    Buen producto

11. 

    Jos̩ Miguel Baumgarten Р15 December 2024

    Llego lo que se ofreció, todo bien, 100% recomendable !!!!

12. 

    Ong Geok Choon Gerald – 15 December 2024

    Overall , the size fit me well. Material look satisfactory . delivery to my home is great.